Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

(1,018 posts)

13. Thanks for the civil response -- I'll give it some thought.

Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:07 PM

Apr 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Due process matters. As long as it is in someway fairly adjudicated ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #2

I considered the question ambiguous ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #4

Gunboy from GD apparently all for guns for threateners Kingofalldems Apr 2013 #5

Depends on the situation and what the judge/jury decide. nt CokeMachine Apr 2013 #6

If it is a felony and the person is found guilty, no gunz. Warren Stupidity Apr 2013 #9

Note the names of who voted NO above. graham4anything Apr 2013 #11

Thanks for the civil response -- I'll give it some thought. CokeMachine Apr 2013 #13

I think it makes sense to elevate a legitimate death threat to a felony. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #12

No offence CreekDog.... defacto7 Apr 2013 #15

"It's a no-brainer." In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #16

Tell me about it. In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #18