Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

armueller2001

(609 posts)
9. eh.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 07:56 PM
Jun 2013
Why do you want to allow assault rifles, which were developed for soldiers in the late 20th century to maximize death & incapacitation on battlefields, to proliferate in american communities?


You're half right. Assault rifles were developed for soldiers, however the current debate (AR15 ban) is not about assault rifles. An assault rifle is, by definition, capable of select fire which is more than one bullet per trigger pull. They are commonly used by armies and are also referred to as "machine guns". Semi-automatic rifles, such as the AR15, fire one bullet per trigger pull just like grandpa's old wood stock hunting rifle. You won't find an army in the world that is using semi-automatic rifles.

Wayne lapierre has been saying for 30 years now how if democrats get elected you can 'kiss your gun rights goodbye', yet it's never happened


It has happened, at least partially. Remember the assault weapon ban of '94? Those who are interested in banning firearms know they can't take the whole loaf at once, it needs to be done slice by slice.

"Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal."
Janet Reno

"Banning guns is an idea whose time has come."
Joseph Biden

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»SCOTUS gives Illinois AG ...»Reply #9