Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
15. So...
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 09:28 AM
Jul 2013

the headline and story lede say the offense was related to the sale to Nancy Lanza... but the only evidence presented just states the offense happened the same day she bought two guns.

In other words, the story says "theoretically possible, but only circumstantial evidence," but the headline and lede (likely written by an editor) says "Fuck yeah!"

So, was it related or not?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So much for law abiding . . . nt flamin lib Jun 2013 #1
It appears a single letter Jenoch Jun 2013 #2
or ever, from what I know BainsBane Jun 2013 #3
I am unaware of that piece of fiction. Jenoch Jun 2013 #4
Sure BainsBane Jun 2013 #5
I have never claimed Jenoch Jun 2013 #6
I didn't say you personally did BainsBane Jun 2013 #7
Words have meaning. Jenoch Jun 2013 #8
and no where did I say you in the sentence BainsBane Jun 2013 #9
The word to which I was referring Jenoch Jun 2013 #12
Oh, but since you bring it up BainsBane Jun 2013 #10
I do wonder about Jenoch Jun 2013 #11
As I told you before BainsBane Jun 2013 #13
I am opposed to all domestic violence. Jenoch Jun 2013 #14
So... bobclark86 Jul 2013 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Gun seller pleads guilty ...»Reply #15