Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ceonupe

(597 posts)
19. you are right
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 05:23 PM
Jul 2013

A sheriff shall issue a permit to carry a concealed handgun to an applicant:
Who is a legal resident of the state.
Is at least twenty-one.
Does not chronically and habitually abuse alcohol.
Demonstrates competency with a firearm.
Who is a legal resident of the state.
Is at least twenty-one.
Is not ineligible to possess a firearm, has not been convicted of perjury in relation to an application for a concealed weapon permit.
Is not an unlawful user of or addicted to a controlled substance as provided in federal law and regulations.
Is not subject to a restraining order in effect at the time the application is submitted, or a permanent restraining order, or a temporary restraining order in effect at the time the application is submitted.

However, the Sheriff can deny the permit if he reasonably believes that documented previous behavior by the applicant makes it likely that the applicant will present a danger to self or others if the permit is issued.

That rejection is subject to an appeal and the sheriff must document that previous behavior and testify as to why he denied the permit.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My wife carries the 642 ileus Jul 2013 #1
BainsBane whats your take on this? ceonupe Jul 2013 #2
After talking with folks in the gungeon BainsBane Jul 2013 #3
Some gun nut came into this protected Group and alerted on your post. Results aren't back yet. Electric Monk Jul 2013 #14
I know who that was BainsBane Jul 2013 #15
Strangely, I still haven't got the jury results back. I wonder if the alerter got banned Electric Monk Jul 2013 #20
Huh? BainsBane Jul 2013 #21
Yes, I was a juror on that alert, over 3 hours ago, but still no jury results. Strange, indeed. nt Electric Monk Jul 2013 #22
The jury results just came in: 0-6 to leave it. I wonder what took so long? Electric Monk Jul 2013 #23
You just received the results? BainsBane Jul 2013 #25
I was on the jury Timbuk3 Jul 2013 #24
Whose grabbing your guns? BainsBane Jul 2013 #26
"gun grabbers" Skittles Jul 2013 #27
It's a misleading. Gun advocates refer to CO as a "shall issue" state. Robb Jul 2013 #4
that should then be classified as may issue BainsBane Jul 2013 #5
Court cases make it shall issue in CO ceonupe Jul 2013 #8
No, but thanks for playing. Robb Jul 2013 #9
Yes ceonupe Jul 2013 #10
No, I showed you the law. It is the sheriff's discretion. Robb Jul 2013 #11
you are right ceonupe Jul 2013 #19
Yes and no. gejohnston Jul 2013 #12
No. Statute does not require a specific reason. Robb Jul 2013 #13
CRS 18-12-203(2) gejohnston Jul 2013 #16
Naked men notwithstanding, you appear at odds with yourself. Robb Jul 2013 #17
not at all gejohnston Jul 2013 #18
States rejected shall issue ccw jimmy the one Jul 2013 #6
state prohibitions, discarded in modern era jimmy the one Jul 2013 #7
veto power, ceu jimmy the one Jul 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Changes in concealed carr...»Reply #19