Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

Squinch

(53,706 posts)

8. But do you see what my point is in this? We are pretty much guaranteeing him a gun,

Reply to sir pball (Reply #7)

Wed Sep 4, 2013, 08:21 PM

Sep 2013

and the Supreme Court has ruled that the local police do not have to protect the wife from that gun even if she gets a restraining order.

So, no rule of law here. That's pretty significant. That's a hole in the social fabric that you could drive a truck through. All because of the gun hobbyists.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Greensboro shooting victim knew estranged husband had a rifle [View all] Robb Sep 2013 OP

this is why the NRA supports re-arming violent felons sigmasix Sep 2013 #1

Welcome to the gun-infested NRA wet-dream culture. madinmaryland Sep 2013 #2

The NRA and billh58 Sep 2013 #3

Even if she were able to get an order of protection, it is pretty meaningless Squinch Sep 2013 #4

Well, it would have stopped him from buying from an FFL, not that that would have mattered. sir pball Sep 2013 #5

He went through the system to buy the gun. Robb Sep 2013 #6

I know, and I agree he shouldn't have been able to. sir pball Sep 2013 #7

But do you see what my point is in this? We are pretty much guaranteeing him a gun, Squinch Sep 2013 #8