Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
2. The Lautenberg amendment already specifies this.
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 11:05 AM
Apr 2014

If you get a misdemeanor DV, you are a felon in the eyes of the law with regards to firearm possession. If you have a DV restraining order, you too are treated as a felon in the eyes of the law for the purposes of owning, possessing, transporting, or using a firearm.

"Minnesota already prevents convicted domestic abusers from owning handguns. The bill would broaden those restrictions to include rifles and any other firearms."

This is federal law, coast to coast, ALL firearms.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_Violence_Offender_Gun_Ban

I don't understand the state-level effort, because it's already the law, and has been since 1996.
The Lautenberg amendment was a huge victory for DV victims nationwide.


If they want to be productive, lobby for allocation of state funds to ENFORCE the existing law, or a state-wide FOID/registration so the police know who to collect guns from. Yes? That's what I would advocate. That's where the law is weak; enforcement. The states can do it, but they need resources, and they need to know WHO to enforce it against.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Gun restrictions on domes...»Reply #2