Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
4. I agree, and have brought this up several times in the Gungeon.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 09:27 AM
Jul 2014

Invariably, it has been shot down (pardon the pun) by our more zealous brethren, on the grounds that the technology won't work, it's unproven, the caliber is too small, it isn't as efficient a killing tool, blah, blah, blah. And, of course, New Jersey. Well, let's get the law amended in NJ and grandfather in the existing handguns, but hold the owners accountable if they are stolen or the cause of unintended shootings. Also, any public carry should be restricted to smart guns. I think the most dangerous aspect of public carry is the risk of being dispossessed of one's gun by someone with criminal intent.

I feel positive that this technology will eventually prevail, just as seatbelts and airbags prevailed. Because it makes sense.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»The Gun Lobby And A Dumb ...»Reply #4