Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
18. It is difficult inside of a home.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 12:29 PM
Dec 2014

IIRC it was tried in a location or two (Nashville TN rings a bell), but was dropped before it made it to court. Since there is no case law, it's difficult to say.

I believe that there was another case where an HOA came up with a rule against the buying or selling of firearms anywhere on their property when they found that one homeowner was running his website from within his home. I'm unsure if there were any physical firearms on the property or if it was simply a case of the website being run from within.

Most of the homeowner's agreements deal primarily with the outside and structure of the home/condo. My own has rules against operating a business from within the property (which I don't wholly agree with, however I was out of town during that vote). But the agreement cannot invalidate state/federal property rights.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»I got this email about th...»Reply #18