Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

russ1943

(618 posts)
3. We're lacking some details but yes he should have been denied.
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 03:43 PM
Jul 2015

I edited my post to acknowledge that there were fuck ups. If accurate info was available to the FBI reviewer, yes his attempt to purchase would have been denied.

The larger picture is that this is a person the statutes prohibit from buying or possessing and yet he was able to pay his money and get his gun!

Firearm Retrieval Referrals
Because of the NICS Section's commitment to public safety and national security, the search for the needed disposition information continues beyond the three business days allowed by the Brady Act. In some instances, the information is subsequently obtained and a final status determined; however, if the final status (determined after the lapse of three business days) results in a deny decision and the NICS Section is advised by the FFL that the firearm was transferred, then the ATF is notified a prohibited person is in possession of a firearm. In 2011, the NICS Section referred 3,166 firearm retrieval actions to the ATF.

Was there ever a denial & a "Firearm Retrieval Referral" issued? I don't know.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»gun dealer exercised its ...»Reply #3