Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
3. Technically, none of those rounds are "armor piercing."
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 10:21 AM
Sep 2015

Most of those you list, if using a fully-jacketed bullet, will probably defeat lower-level body armor (most any hunting rifle caliber will do so, but those pistol rounds woudl be iffy, even the .44 mag), but aren't specifically designed for penetrating armor. Ammunition designed to defeat armor will have a steel (or tungsten, beryllium, etc.) core in the bullet, or even a sharply-tapered bullet entirely of the harder metal.

There are sensible federal restrictions on armor piercing rounds for handguns (essentially, you can't buy such ammo), designed to keep criminals from having ammo that will defeat police body armor. Criminals rarely use rifles, and the handguns chambered for rifle rounds have the same problem for criminals that rifles do: they're far too bulky to conceal.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»what is an armor piercing...»Reply #3