Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Movies

Staph

(6,373 posts)

4. Your review is only a spoiler if...

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Fri Oct 12, 2018, 06:55 PM

Oct 2018

the reader has never seen any of the four previous versions from 1932, 1937, 1954 (with Judy Garland) or 1976 (with Barbra Streisand).

But then, I'm an old movie fan (and a fan of old movies!), so I've seen three of the previous ones!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just saw A Star is Born...OMG! SPOILER ALERT! [View all] busterbrown Oct 2018 OP

Maybe put spoiler alert? Croney Oct 2018 #1

Sorry... never posted on this site... busterbrown Oct 2018 #2

Cool! Croney Oct 2018 #3

Your review is only a spoiler if... Staph Oct 2018 #4

A friend of mine saw it and hated it. meadowlark5 Oct 2018 #5

thing is that... it got very very good Reviews. busterbrown Oct 2018 #6

With a few notable exceptions, successful actors usually suck at singing redstateblues Oct 2018 #7

No...Was not his singing which bugged me.. busterbrown Oct 2018 #8

as long as it is better than the judy garland version. GAH! pansypoo53219 Oct 2018 #9

My husband and I both liked it better than the Judy Garland one Chalco Oct 2018 #10

I agree it was a little long n/t TexasBushwhacker Oct 2018 #11

Go Go Ga Ga! pressbox69 Nov 2018 #12

Most of the experts pressbox69 Feb 2019 #13