General Discussion

RockRaven

(16,538 posts)

1. I don't know about the specifics of your hypothesis, but I would not

Sat Dec 14, 2024, 11:14 PM

Dec 14

find it unreasonable to hypothesize that some of the sightings were the product of some government body's actions which they are not being transparent about. And that they are happy to hide in the noise.

If one reads the various official statements, and considers the aggressive technicality/loophole/didn't-actually-say mindset of government spokespeople, there are freight train-sized holes to drive through when considering the question: "are ANY of these incidents being talked about a government action?"

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OAITW r.2.0 Brenda

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The drones are US UAV's looking for some nuclear material or chemical signature. [View all] NightWatcher Dec 14 OP

I don't know about the specifics of your hypothesis, but I would not RockRaven Dec 14 #1

You are correct. Eko Dec 15 #2

some people out here too busy playing checkers Nimble_Idea Dec 15 #5

And some people believe made up things with no evidence. Eko Dec 15 #9

I keep posting this, but no takers I like your idea. Kicking it. usonian Dec 15 #3

These are better ideas than most of what is being posted Mike 03 Dec 15 #7

Wow, the FUD machine Disaffected Dec 15 #4

The nuclear isotope theory makes the most sense to me because of Mike 03 Dec 15 #6

Quantum. muriel_volestrangler Dec 15 #8