Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Baitball Blogger

(48,445 posts)

3. Okay, somebody explain.

Reply to Quiet Em (Original post)

Mon Dec 16, 2024, 08:52 PM

Dec 16

I must be confusing the cases. I thought that Jack Smith closed this case without prejudice.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge Merchan upholds Trump's conviction, no immunity [View all] Quiet Em Dec 16 OP

Quiet Em............ Upthevibe Dec 16 #1

You are very welcome. Quiet Em Dec 16 #2

Okay, somebody explain. Baitball Blogger Dec 16 #3

presidential immunity ruling in Trump NY criminal case Celerity Dec 16 #4

Okay! Thank you! Baitball Blogger Dec 16 #8

This is the New York State case. Quiet Em Dec 16 #5

Thank you! Baitball Blogger Dec 16 #7

See comment #12 for more details.... magicarpet Dec 16 #14

That was the Judge Chutkan case against DJT magicarpet Dec 16 #12

Sad but understandable that it's so hard to keep track of Trump's incessant criminality Orrex Dec 16 #21

This is the state of NY case where Trump was found guilty by a jury Ocelot II Dec 16 #28

"The Trump Court". C_U_L8R Dec 16 #6

While somewhat funny, it is referring to the USSC that rulled in the case titled 'Trump v. United States'. Like how kelly1mm Dec 16 #15

Merchan should replace a Supreme Court member! Bluethroughu Dec 16 #9

Not until he is sentenced and serving time. lees1975 Dec 17 #38

You are right. Bluethroughu Dec 17 #39

So there are still people who think trump will do actual time?? Callie1979 Dec 17 #46

K&R UTUSN Dec 16 #10

Rec malaise Dec 16 #11

Thank you Judge Merchan. republianmushroom Dec 16 #13

So when is the sentencing? nt kelly1mm Dec 16 #16

Probably in four years. Emile Dec 16 #17

Why not tomorrow? President Trump is not taking office till Jan 20, 2025. Why not put him in prison for 30 days? nt kelly1mm Dec 16 #18

Works for me. Emile Dec 16 #19

Excellent idea. Put him in Gitmo. The only way back to the White House is to swim. Dem2theMax Dec 16 #29

Awesome news - the 34 convictions by Alvin Bragg stand - yipee!! n/t iluvtennis Dec 16 #20

Excellent news! mcar Dec 16 #22

K & R SunSeeker Dec 16 #23

So he's convicted him. SENTENCE HIM NOW! Or your law is worthless and so are your judges robes. lees1975 Dec 16 #24

Do not bdamomma Dec 16 #25

Maybe he can work from prison. usonian Dec 16 #26

would so love to see this Metaphorical Dec 16 #30

I was subtly referring to the USA Today headline: usonian Dec 16 #32

Good thing that ABC had nothing to do with it.. chouchou Dec 16 #27

Well, the judge could put him on a wire until he serves time. usonian Dec 16 #31

If you won't jail him pfitz59 Dec 16 #33

And house arrest Beachnutt Dec 17 #45

Kicking this for those of us who can't deal with video. usonian Dec 17 #34

Won't orange psycho just appeal it to sc? Meowmee Dec 17 #35

I think Linda ladeewolf Dec 17 #36

The Stain that is Trump, 70sEraVet Dec 17 #37

Which means trump is president for life Turbineguy Dec 17 #40

Unfortunately, on appeal another Court might find that immunity applies. malthaussen Dec 17 #41

I'm not a lawyer, but I doubt an appeal can be filed before sentencing. Justice matters. Dec 17 #42

Plopp! - another truth turd for the G.O.P. Christmas Punchbowl BoRaGard Dec 17 #43

Glenn K's take on this... RobertDevereaux Dec 17 #44

Oh, fuck me -- At least somebody out there still has some stones Blue_Tires Dec 17 #47

About goddamned time. DiverDave Dec 17 #48