General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Child rape is illegal and should be punished even if it is a republican president or congressman. [View all]MineralMan
(148,675 posts)He probably could have been charged, but was not. I'm not in a position to decide such things. He has ruined his career, and it cost him his position as a member of Congress, along with his appointment as Attorney General, both of which are good things.
He was not prosecuted, though. Had he been, he probably would not have gotten convicted, given all of the circumstances.
I don't call 17-year-olds children. Minors, yes. Underaged minors when it comes to sexual consent, depending on location. I call them young women or young men.
When I was 18 and younger, I certainly engaged in sexual activity with young women of that age and a bit younger. When I graduated from high school, I didn't do that any more. Did I break the law as a teenager? Yes, I did. Pretty much everyone I knew then was breaking those laws. I was in California, where the age of consent at that time was 21. Was I charged with crimes? I was not, nor do I remember any high school kids getting charged with such crimes for doing the same things.
Why was Gaetz not charged with sex with a minor? I cannot answer that. He could have been, of course. A decision was made not to charge him. Not my decision, nor do I agree with that decision. But, it was made, and I think I know why it wasn't made. Insufficient evidence and the questionable liability to age of consent laws, probably. But no charges were made.
You can try to make me the bad guy here, but I'm not. I'm just explaining why referring to teenagers near or over the age of consent as "children" is inaccurate. You might disagree with me. That's fine. But I am not Gaetz.
Edit history
