Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: A Constitutional Convention? Some Democrats Fear It's Coming. [View all]ancianita
(39,072 posts)12. A Constitutional Convention Would Supercharge Project 2025
https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2024/10/10/a-constitutional-convention-would-supercharge-project-2025/
Although ALEC and its allies speak in generalities about what they would seek to accomplish in a convention using vague terms such as fiscal responsibility and limiting federal overreach they clearly see an Article V convention as a crucial vehicle for enacting the same radical agenda that drove Project 2025. Indeed, ALEC serves on the advisory board for Project 2025.
These intentions are evident from the enormous resources ALECs funders are devoting to pushing for an Article V convention and from the amendments proposed by the mock conventions they have convened. The most recent of these was the Convention of States (COS) August 2023 mock convention in Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia, bringing together mostly Republican legislators from 49 states...
The key to preventing a new Republican majority in Congress from calling an Article V convention is to deny them enough state applications to be able to make a credible claim that two-thirds of the states have applied for one, as the Constitution requires. Although the ALEC-allied groups are well short of two-thirds of the states on any honest measure, ALEC and one of the lawyers involved in the 2020 fake electors scheme have been devising exotic legal theories that would allow them to count states old, moot, and unrelated convention calls toward the 34-state threshold.
These intentions are evident from the enormous resources ALECs funders are devoting to pushing for an Article V convention and from the amendments proposed by the mock conventions they have convened. The most recent of these was the Convention of States (COS) August 2023 mock convention in Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia, bringing together mostly Republican legislators from 49 states...
Project 2025 seeks to undermine civil rights, demanding an end to energetic enforcement of the rights of people seeking to access abortion clinics (at pp. 557-58) and redirecting the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department to attack diversity programs (at pp. 560-62). COSs Federal Legislative & Executive Jurisdiction Proposal 1 goes even farther, eliminating the constitutional authority for most civil rights laws by sharply restricting Congresss authority to regulate interstate commerce to buying, selling, or transportation of commercial goods and services across state lines. All existing laws and regulations exceeding this authority, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fair Housing Act of 1968, would be nullified in two years.
The key to preventing a new Republican majority in Congress from calling an Article V convention is to deny them enough state applications to be able to make a credible claim that two-thirds of the states have applied for one, as the Constitution requires. Although the ALEC-allied groups are well short of two-thirds of the states on any honest measure, ALEC and one of the lawyers involved in the 2020 fake electors scheme have been devising exotic legal theories that would allow them to count states old, moot, and unrelated convention calls toward the 34-state threshold.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A Constitutional Convention at this time would be against our best interest. They could strike freedom of religion,
pnwmom
Dec 16
#14
Not quite. The convention replaces congress but the states still have to ratify it.
Angleae
Dec 16
#5
If a convention is called, blue states should work together to use it to leave the union
eallen
Dec 16
#3
At this point, I would be in favor of that. I don't want or need my life to be influenced by the decisions of
Karasu
Dec 16
#7
The gqp resurrect this relic every few yrs as if it's just a simple process. Nothing could be further from the truth
PortTack
Dec 16
#17
Not unless the people of each state are the ones to choose their delegates.
OldBaldy1701E
Dec 16
#21
In some ways its not a bad idea, but people can't understand or stick with the one we have.
LT Barclay
Dec 16
#24