Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Chemical Bill

(2,760 posts)

10. I think the subject line of the OP is a bit limited.

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Mon Dec 30, 2024, 12:53 AM

Dec 2024

Yes, the WaPo is part of the answer to the question posed, but one must include the NYT, Faux News, Xitter, etc.

We don't even need to read the article when the answer is given by the title and the source.

Bill

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why did Bidenomics fail to deliver at the polls? - WaPo [View all] question everything Dec 2024 OP

Uninformed populace doesn't understand 'economics.' elleng Dec 2024 #1

No, you do not understand. I had a discussion with another DUer recently raising a similar comments question everything Dec 2024 #2

Got it, and my statement stands, maybe should be 'NO ONE' undestands. elleng Dec 2024 #4

This. Plus media choosing to focus on Biden's age, gaffes, tulipsandroses Dec 2024 #3

Yes! elleng Dec 2024 #5

Inflation. Unemployment doesn't count unless doc03 Dec 2024 #6

Inflation was in double digits and rising in 1980 Fiendish Thingy Dec 2024 #9

People are reminded daily how expensive everything is after the 20% inflation that occurred in 2021-23 MichMan Dec 2024 #16

Inflation goes down but prices never go down doc03 Dec 2024 #25

That's right, the capitalists find out what the market will be and that's what they charge Walleye Dec 2024 #26

Harris didnt actually run on Bidenomics ColinC Dec 2024 #7

Likely because the term polled so bad MichMan Dec 2024 #15

Regardless, the article says it lost "at the polls" ColinC Dec 2024 #18

Pretty hard for the sitting VP to not run on the economy of the administration she is part of. MichMan Dec 2024 #20

It isnt if you dont make ads about it or talk about it in your speeches ColinC Dec 2024 #24

I think it was lack of advertising. Just my thoughts, no proof. Bang home the good stuff over and over... mitch96 Dec 2024 #8

I think the subject line of the OP is a bit limited. Chemical Bill Dec 2024 #10

Oh, come on. Stop trying to explain this away. lees1975 Dec 2024 #11

To be fair, a big percentage of trump media attention was over rape, fraud, insurrection, lies, obstruction, etc., Silent Type Dec 2024 #13

In the, say, 6 months before the election? dpibel Dec 2024 #17

Not the media I watch. It was on part of every hour from moment charges or civil suits were filed. Silent Type Dec 2024 #19

What charges or civil suits were filed in that time frame? dpibel Dec 2024 #21

Puppies and unicorns don't work Historic NY Dec 2024 #12

Too many politicians believe the way to reach the working class is at union halls. MichMan Dec 2024 #14

I stopped reading at this part: Blue_Tires Dec 2024 #22

Bidenomics didn't deliver at the polls because Blue_Tires Dec 2024 #23

Yep. All the postmortem analysis I have seen ignores the fact that America won't elect a woman as president Walleye Dec 2024 #27

This won't be popular to say here, but trying to coin "Bidenomics" was an awful mistake. bearsfootball516 Dec 2024 #28

This is rich . . . Scubamatt Dec 2024 #29