Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BainsBane

(54,982 posts)
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 11:30 PM Dec 2013

A plea to ignore the flame bait [View all]

There are certain stories posted to GD for the clear purpose of inciting flame wars between feminists and anti-feminists. I encourage everyone in HOF and anyone else who is sick of that stuff to ignore the threads. Don't feed into the nonsense that serves no purpose other than to distract from the issues that most concern feminists and all DUers.

Now, I don't claim to be immune from having posted stuff that resulted in massive flame wars. In some cases I had a specific point to make and decided the ensuing flame was worth it. In others I had not anticipated the controversy. I am not especially good at telling in advance what will attract attention, but some members are. One thing I have learned is that it serves no good having the same discussions endlessly with people who do not care about how you feel. So let's not indulge them. Okay? Without us, those threads will fall like rocks because there is only so much the anti-feminists can do without our participation. If they talk shit about us, so what? Trash the thread and the shit becomes theirs alone.

Edited to add: I'm well aware I'm making a plea to myself here as much as anyone else.

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A plea to ignore the flame bait [View all] BainsBane Dec 2013 OP
i did ignore the flamefest of the OP. BUT, i am not going ot be quiet when a poster says sexual seabeyond Dec 2013 #1
That's your choice BainsBane Dec 2013 #3
Let them post thier bait - we (you, me, anybody) xulamaude Dec 2013 #2
As long as people realize those threads are set up BainsBane Dec 2013 #4
Yes, of course. xulamaude Dec 2013 #10
I almost always do ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #5
Yes, you are far better than I at it BainsBane Dec 2013 #7
On the other hand... redqueen Dec 2013 #6
The other point is BainsBane Dec 2013 #8
yes. many alerts were flying on that thread. i got pms... i alerted on none, yet, seabeyond Dec 2013 #11
There is almost no point alerting BainsBane Dec 2013 #12
yup. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #13
Depending on who the OP is by and what the subject matter is ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #9
Also keep in mind that if we post OPs that focus on what we care about BainsBane Dec 2013 #14
Thing is, though, even in the stupidest most meaningless threads, redqueen Dec 2013 #18
no, it wasn't. BainsBane Dec 2013 #19
but again. they thru up the picture from 40's. 3 or 4 others came in and made the point. it is seabeyond Dec 2013 #20
That thread is fucking hilarious. redqueen Dec 2013 #23
is pretty in the face obvious. dontcha think? i do. i think it was all well spelled out thruout. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #31
LOL, yep.. redqueen Dec 2013 #22
it would be very ineresting to see some demograhics and information compiled from Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2013 #15
If they talk shit about us, so what? Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2013 #16
A Democratic Party that is majority female and people of color BainsBane Dec 2013 #17
point. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #21
Hell yes to this thread DonCoquixote Dec 2013 #24
I've had hides like that BainsBane Dec 2013 #25
I know I am not Skinner DonCoquixote Dec 2013 #26
yes, but the site administrators appear to be comfortable with those standards BainsBane Dec 2013 #27
^^^Sadly, true. Soon we'll have to change the site name to "Sigma Chi." Squinch Dec 2013 #36
I know your post is about not fighting them cinnabonbon Dec 2013 #28
Welcome to DU. Thanks for signing up. boston bean Dec 2013 #29
thanks! cinnabonbon Dec 2013 #38
a second welcome. and yes. that one effect my thinking process. i saw a psa yesterday and seabeyond Dec 2013 #32
I know the feeling cinnabonbon Dec 2013 #39
Glad you've decided to start posting! redqueen Dec 2013 #42
I've been looking forward to it! cinnabonbon Dec 2013 #43
WE talk about the problems with it. they cannot answer that. will not answer. because then it is seabeyond Dec 2013 #44
I am glad we talk about it, at least. cinnabonbon Dec 2013 #45
i would be ok with... k, you are right. and i am still gonna watch. lol. seabeyond Dec 2013 #46
Haha. cinnabonbon Dec 2013 #47
I see what you mean, but it's hard to let some of these statements pass. Would it be Squinch Dec 2013 #30
I think it's up to the individual ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #33
There are more than one that I can't stand. We do have an MRA fundamentalist kaffee klatsch here. Squinch Dec 2013 #35
I'd be interested to know who that one is BainsBane Dec 2013 #48
Once again, my choice to Ignore all the jagoffs seems to have paid off. Sheldon Cooper Dec 2013 #34
i listen to you all, and i still cant. when someone says sexual assault laws are a "slippery slope" seabeyond Dec 2013 #37
That's because you're a badass ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #40
ha. an irritant, lol. thanks. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #41
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»A plea to ignore the flam...»Reply #0