Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: A plea to ignore the flame bait [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)20. but again. they thru up the picture from 40's. 3 or 4 others came in and made the point. it is
not just the small group they claim, that see it in the picture. without one person speaking out, maybe no one would have. and it would have been left standing that the small minority saw that in the picture.
i get what you are saying. but, some things cant be left standing without speaking out. the OP was bullshit. i agree.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
i did ignore the flamefest of the OP. BUT, i am not going ot be quiet when a poster says sexual
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#1
yes. many alerts were flying on that thread. i got pms... i alerted on none, yet,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#11
but again. they thru up the picture from 40's. 3 or 4 others came in and made the point. it is
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#20
is pretty in the face obvious. dontcha think? i do. i think it was all well spelled out thruout. nt
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#31
it would be very ineresting to see some demograhics and information compiled from
Tuesday Afternoon
Dec 2013
#15
yes, but the site administrators appear to be comfortable with those standards
BainsBane
Dec 2013
#27
a second welcome. and yes. that one effect my thinking process. i saw a psa yesterday and
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#32
WE talk about the problems with it. they cannot answer that. will not answer. because then it is
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#44
I see what you mean, but it's hard to let some of these statements pass. Would it be
Squinch
Dec 2013
#30
There are more than one that I can't stand. We do have an MRA fundamentalist kaffee klatsch here.
Squinch
Dec 2013
#35