Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: A plea to ignore the flame bait [View all]ismnotwasm
(42,481 posts)33. I think it's up to the individual
Posters like both BB's and Redqueen and Sea take certain topics on and do a great job. I'll only do it if they come here, or if I think they have something say, but not the ability or perhaps the desire--to adequately express themselves or occasionally when the assholism quotient is so high I feel obligated. There are a few I will guarantee are icky MRA trolls
Not every topic starts out as flame bait, and I accept that, but there's trigger words like porn, prostitution, etc. that it's impossible to have a decent debate over.
There's one little cheerleader I find exceptionally appalling, and there is just no way for me to ever be pleasant to that person. So I never engage them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
i did ignore the flamefest of the OP. BUT, i am not going ot be quiet when a poster says sexual
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#1
yes. many alerts were flying on that thread. i got pms... i alerted on none, yet,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#11
but again. they thru up the picture from 40's. 3 or 4 others came in and made the point. it is
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#20
is pretty in the face obvious. dontcha think? i do. i think it was all well spelled out thruout. nt
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#31
it would be very ineresting to see some demograhics and information compiled from
Tuesday Afternoon
Dec 2013
#15
yes, but the site administrators appear to be comfortable with those standards
BainsBane
Dec 2013
#27
a second welcome. and yes. that one effect my thinking process. i saw a psa yesterday and
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#32
WE talk about the problems with it. they cannot answer that. will not answer. because then it is
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#44
I see what you mean, but it's hard to let some of these statements pass. Would it be
Squinch
Dec 2013
#30
There are more than one that I can't stand. We do have an MRA fundamentalist kaffee klatsch here.
Squinch
Dec 2013
#35