Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

5. and madrast, it really is so very ismple to answer the question. no challenge. no hypocrisy.

Reply to MadrasT (Reply #2)

Sun Dec 22, 2013, 12:27 PM

Dec 2013

no need to lie. a very simple answer. the poster though proves the difference between agenda rule vs integrity.

the woman touched the cop. at that point, all bets are off.

wow. that was hard.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

didn't expect an honest, reveal one's hypocrisy, managed to avoid both by refusing to answer, [View all] seabeyond Dec 2013 OP

How is it worthwhile to be here? I saw all of this - I see all of this. There is NO justification seaglass Dec 2013 #1

your post is not so easy to address. and may take a little time. this si step one. awareness. seabeyond Dec 2013 #4

It is definitely far worse BainsBane Dec 2013 #10

Laughably transparent attempt to back you into a corner by directing the discussion. MadrasT Dec 2013 #2

L.O. fucking L. yes. lol fuckin' l. ha ha. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #3

and madrast, it really is so very ismple to answer the question. no challenge. no hypocrisy. seabeyond Dec 2013 #5

You know you're not going to get rational discussions from them. redqueen Dec 2013 #6

it is not for them... seabeyond Dec 2013 #7

Aha... redqueen Dec 2013 #8

"a slipper slope" BainsBane Dec 2013 #9