Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Showing Original Post only (View all)White privilege 101: Here’s the basic lesson Paul Ryan, Tal Fortgang and Donald Sterling need [View all]
Last edited Mon May 12, 2014, 10:03 PM - Edit history (1)
And all the DUers that don't understand what the fuck White privilege is. While this article is somewhat intellectual in tone, I'm sure all the ones who are defining their arguments against white male privilege will have no problems understanding it.
And yet, Katie McDonough correctly argued, his denial of racism and his own privileged position represents a new majority view among whites, who think theyre more discriminated against than blacks, despite all manner of evidence to the contrary (more on that below). And this is where the danger and the challenge to progressives lies as well as the challenge to the Democratic Party. Ifas recent research suggests whites grow increasingly conservative as perceived minority voting power grows, then the Rising American electorate argument itself is in danger. It could be every bit as much a fantasy, in its own, much more sophisticated way, as the Tea Party fantasy that the GOP can just double down on where it is, and get by on better messaging and a sprinkling of more diverse spokes/front people.
There is a way to fight back against this very real, and so far unrecognized, threat. And that is for white people especially white men to step up and push back (lovingly or forcefully, as the situation dictates) against this sort of polarizing rhetoric and the thinking and feeling thats connected to it. Its not just a matter of paternalistically helping out women and minorities when theyre attacked. The fortunes of white working-class men have plummeted since the early 70s not because women and minorities have stolen their cheese, but because theyre snookered into thinking like that, making themselves easy marks for far more sophisticated actors to take advantage of. And whats long been true for working-class white men will increasingly become true of white men with college degrees as well. One of Thomas Pikettys central points is that any sort of labor, however skilled it may be, is going to lose out to inherited capital in the long run, if the basic structures of todays capitalist economy arent changed.
So how do white men fight back, not just for the sake of others, or society as a whole, but for themselves, as well? There are lots of ways they can do this, but here Id like to focus on just one: by gaining a much a more solid, objective understanding of what minorities (especially blacks) and women already largely understand as a basic fact of life how racial and gender privilege work, with white male ignorance as a key component. Its only by unifying against an already unified economic elite that Americans of all races and ethnicities can keep hope alive for a more prosperous future.
Before going any further, I just want to quote from McDonoughs article, where she references a sampling of the information already out there:
Its likely that Fortgang will have the opportunity at Princeton to learn about the racial wealth gap, the legacy of red-lining, the unemployment rate among college educated men of color versus their white counterparts, the convergence of racism and sexism that leaves women of color disproportionately impacted by domestic violence, the gender pay gap experienced by black women, the deadly violence faced by black children and the myriad other manifestations of racism in the United States. Basically all of the things that he will never have to experience as an extraordinarily privileged white man.
There is a way to fight back against this very real, and so far unrecognized, threat. And that is for white people especially white men to step up and push back (lovingly or forcefully, as the situation dictates) against this sort of polarizing rhetoric and the thinking and feeling thats connected to it. Its not just a matter of paternalistically helping out women and minorities when theyre attacked. The fortunes of white working-class men have plummeted since the early 70s not because women and minorities have stolen their cheese, but because theyre snookered into thinking like that, making themselves easy marks for far more sophisticated actors to take advantage of. And whats long been true for working-class white men will increasingly become true of white men with college degrees as well. One of Thomas Pikettys central points is that any sort of labor, however skilled it may be, is going to lose out to inherited capital in the long run, if the basic structures of todays capitalist economy arent changed.
So how do white men fight back, not just for the sake of others, or society as a whole, but for themselves, as well? There are lots of ways they can do this, but here Id like to focus on just one: by gaining a much a more solid, objective understanding of what minorities (especially blacks) and women already largely understand as a basic fact of life how racial and gender privilege work, with white male ignorance as a key component. Its only by unifying against an already unified economic elite that Americans of all races and ethnicities can keep hope alive for a more prosperous future.
Before going any further, I just want to quote from McDonoughs article, where she references a sampling of the information already out there:
Its likely that Fortgang will have the opportunity at Princeton to learn about the racial wealth gap, the legacy of red-lining, the unemployment rate among college educated men of color versus their white counterparts, the convergence of racism and sexism that leaves women of color disproportionately impacted by domestic violence, the gender pay gap experienced by black women, the deadly violence faced by black children and the myriad other manifestations of racism in the United States. Basically all of the things that he will never have to experience as an extraordinarily privileged white man.
http://www.salon.com/2014/05/09/white_privilege_101_heres_the_basic_lesson_paul_ryan_tal_fortgang_and_donald_sterling/
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White privilege 101: Here’s the basic lesson Paul Ryan, Tal Fortgang and Donald Sterling need [View all]
ismnotwasm
May 2014
OP
not now it isn't but, it is quickly getting to that stage. There will be a heirarchy even then, yes.
Tuesday Afternoon
May 2014
#6
Yep...the fact that even on DU so many White men are freaking out over the term White Privilege
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#29
It. Is. Not!! I have two Masters Degrees and a Doctorate. I earn a 6-figure income.
Liberal_Stalwart71
May 2014
#14
it *will* is what I said/meant. it is coming to that. there will still be a hierarchy. By no means
Tuesday Afternoon
May 2014
#16
Exactly....and the fact that so many on DU have the nerve to suggest this doesn't exist
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#5
White entitlement is maybe a better term, white privilege is a term that seems to get people's backs
Fred Sanders
May 2014
#9
it is at the point now that people do not really care if they have offended the offensive.
Tuesday Afternoon
May 2014
#12
See, this is the problem. Black people have been taught from the craddle to do everything
Liberal_Stalwart71
May 2014
#15
Amen to the white collar jobs in same peril as blue collar jobs, H1 abuse could rise overnight
uponit7771
May 2014
#11
We only pretend not to know what "white privilege" is. Maybe we should change the term to
Liberal_Stalwart71
May 2014
#13
I think part of the problem is that being told to "check your privilege" is provocative
elias7
May 2014
#19
check your privilege is akin to asking you to consider (before speaking) the POV and experience of
bettyellen
May 2014
#28
Yes-it sounds a put down to some of the initiated too though. God don't we love lectures on tone....
bettyellen
May 2014
#35
Seems they really *have* no politics except being (perhaps justifiably) jealous of rich people.
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#40
agreed. this one and I personally like the Louis CK one in GD, too. But this one speaks to the
Tuesday Afternoon
May 2014
#44